Mythos
![](http://personal.monm.edu/wthomas/mythology/images/David.jpg)
Every now and then a conflict of belief's comes arises concerning the sum and substance of mythology. These narratives may be in the form of religious belief's and practices or in the form of urban legends - but one cannot underestimate the impact they have on the prevalent society who are influenced by these myths.
The essence of the disagreement is primarily - are myth's fact..... or fiction apparently holds sway across much of the civilized world, from the Ramayana and Mahabharata epics of Hindusdu's to the book of Genesis of Christians. On one side you have the 'prove the myth - else it is rubbish' supporters and on the other you have the 'it did happen - my faith is based on it' opposition, both equally dedicated to the task of proving themselves right.
Problem is, that if indeed these legends were actually true incidents, they happened so long ago, that it becomes no trivial task to prove or disprove a myth. When that happens people resort to faith or science to try and explain the un-explainable, again what I believe to be a dead end.
From some reflective thinking on the topic I think I may have an alternate hypothesis which would aim and satisfy both parties - if not please do not misconstrue it as an attempt to inflame passion, rather as a introduction of an alternate thought process.
The question that begs being asked is whether(or was) the actual happening of the incident in question (whether it be the story or Adam and Eve, or the Ramayana) is of utmost importance, or is it something more subtle, but one of far greater value. Maybe, just maybe what is really of significance is the punch line - the core lesson that the narrative intends to impart. A lesson of the human frailty of man (Adam and Eve), a struggle between good triumphing over evil (Ramayana) are some of them. Isn't this the crux of these treatise?
The essence of the disagreement is primarily - are myth's fact..... or fiction apparently holds sway across much of the civilized world, from the Ramayana and Mahabharata epics of Hindusdu's to the book of Genesis of Christians. On one side you have the 'prove the myth - else it is rubbish' supporters and on the other you have the 'it did happen - my faith is based on it' opposition, both equally dedicated to the task of proving themselves right.
Problem is, that if indeed these legends were actually true incidents, they happened so long ago, that it becomes no trivial task to prove or disprove a myth. When that happens people resort to faith or science to try and explain the un-explainable, again what I believe to be a dead end.
From some reflective thinking on the topic I think I may have an alternate hypothesis which would aim and satisfy both parties - if not please do not misconstrue it as an attempt to inflame passion, rather as a introduction of an alternate thought process.
The question that begs being asked is whether(or was) the actual happening of the incident in question (whether it be the story or Adam and Eve, or the Ramayana) is of utmost importance, or is it something more subtle, but one of far greater value. Maybe, just maybe what is really of significance is the punch line - the core lesson that the narrative intends to impart. A lesson of the human frailty of man (Adam and Eve), a struggle between good triumphing over evil (Ramayana) are some of them. Isn't this the crux of these treatise?
Many centuries ago, one person did the same, talking in parables to describe to his followers the means to achieve enlightenment. And this erudite teacher had a reason for doing so - it was the only means of making a common person understand complex ideologies. True to his time, this still must hold value even today, since so many are engaged in trying to identify themselves in this modern world.
Coming to think about it, the consternation about whether these stories are fact or fiction is irrelevant. These narratives, whether true or false, have stood the test of time, not on the literary value, but on their moral teachings - and that is what we need to imbibe.